“Death will come

And it will have your eyes”,

Pavese says

“Not mine, I say

Because I’ll have them before her.”

I would like to say that, despite all the adversities I had to face in life, I have achieved what I wanted to achieve: to understand my fellow men, the universe and the world in which I was born and I’m living. In other words, in my way, I understood them.

Sure, I could have committed suicide without saying a word, as most suicides do. Instead, I do the opposite, I write the reasons that would probably lead me to this act and I say that for me suicide was one of the most convenient things of my life: I could get rid of it when and how I wanted.

My death, therefore. In fact, I had already decided on this act towards the end of the Sixties, in Paris. Then it didn’t happen. Then, the “then” of this time, became the then of today and between these two “thens” passed more than 50 years. I reasoned like this in those past times and I still think like this:

Being born from nothing and then returning to another nothing without a “but” and without a “why”, is not fun for a mind that thinks and from any point of view one sees it.

Hearing the ever closer and closer footsteps of the Lady of Darkness night after night is not a pleasant melody, particularly when you know where this sad music will end.

Nature has never been my ideal and never could be as it is. It is at the mercy of at least three principles one worse than the other: the principle of the absurd, the principle of eat or you will be eaten and the principle of the Lady of Darkness. These three universal laws, ranging from micro to macro, apply to every inanimate and animate phenomenon in the entire universe: giant stars swallow the smaller ones and the stronger animals eat the weaker ones. The rest is dominated by the absurd and death. In such a made world, there is no escape for anyone, genius or imbecile he or she  may be.

This being the case, I would gladly embrace Schopenhauer’s idea, that is, if I had to choose between being born and not being born, I would choose not to be born; if I had to choose when to die, I would choose immediately after birth; if I were forced to live my whole life, I would live it getting drunk all the time so as not to hear the footsteps of the Lady of Darkness.

Living then in a society that has, as its main rules, exploitation, violence, wars, discrimination, falsehoods and is made of victims and executioners, it’s not fun. This sort of society has always turned my stomach and insulted my sensibility, my heart and the brain, and I think it is so for all those who have a human dignity and a social conscience. Since the “homo species” appeared on this planet, it has been and still is in the wrong hands. It has to change masters. There is no other way if you want to save it.

In short, if we went to the core of life’s phenomenon, we must ask:

Why do we come into the world?

To die.

Does life have a meaning?

Only the one we give it.

Are we alone?

fundamentally we are all alone.

And what is death?

A release!

Today I am no longer as young as I was in the Sixties, today my 82 years are starting to make me feel their weight less and less light. I do not want to burden them again with ailments, troubles and efforts, much less humiliate them by giving a life at the mercy of a growing unworthy existence. And since there is no time in this world so made to feel sorry for yourself, I decided that my time has come for me to close up with this insulting thing called life!

My death, therefore. This, unlike my birth, I want to manage it myself in all respects and I have to do it while I am alive and in good health, because, in my view, one of the most important things in life is, not only how do you live, but also how do you die.

It is 10.30 in the morning of any day in July 2021 and I am about to enter the office of the Defabianis’ funeral home, in Biella. This is where today I will choose (with me there are Lorenza Negro, my compagnon, and Mr. Massimo Bracco, a representative of the company), my coffin and I will give instructions for my funeral.

First of all I choose the coffin; second, I don’t want neither a funeral nor funeral announcements; third, I want to be cremated in a white habit in the Aosta Valley or in Valenza crematorium; fourth, I want my ashes to be scattered over the Biellese mountains (many of my ideas, which later ended up in the books I published, came to me while I was walking on these mountains); fifth, I am an atheist and not baptized and as such I want to be cremated.

Regarding my funeral, I gave instructions to the Defabianis funeral company and one of their representative Mr. Massimo Bracco. I also delegate my dearest friend Armando Amatista together with my son Julian Goerisch: may they carry out my wishes.

This is the funeral I want. Sorry for the inconvenience and thanks for everything.

Last but not least. Whether I commit suicide or not, it doesn’t change anything. For me it’s as if I had done it, as if I had committed suicide.

“In scientific progress, imagination is more important than knowledge, real or imagined,” Richard Feynman.

If we talk about science in the manner of Copernicus, Newton, Darwin, there is nothing to say, everything is in order. The Sun is at the center of the Solar System; we can experience gravity by jumping from a wall; and no one can deny that we are the 194th monkey, according to Desmond Morris.

As regards mathematics, quantum physics, strings, in brief, artificial intelligence, it is obvious that here we are not talking about real science like that of Copernicus, Newton or Darwin, but we are talking about how to organize abstract concepts that resemble science, but in reality they are not science.

In other words, are mathematics, quantum physics, strings equipped with genetic mutations and natural selection? At all. Mathematics, quantum physics, strings, it’s all artificial stuff produced by an artificial mind; Copernicus’ heliocentrism, Newton’s gravity and Darwin’s evolution are all scientific.

Literature, theater, philosophy have explained the world we live in by saying that it is an objectification of the absurd and, in reality, this is precisely its essence and substance. In fact, when we go to the core of every abstract or concrete phenomenon, we find nothing but the absurd.

Socially speaking, and this concept should be clear even to imbeciles, ours is a world of legalized gangsters. Call them whatever you want: kings, popes, politicians, capitalists, nothing changes: gangsters. The first man to appear on Earth was a gangster.

What we have just said should be enough to make us understand a little about the world we live in. Of course, there is more, much more, but let’s continue with order.

Let’s talk about the Universe. We’ll start from the beginning, from the nothingness of nothingness, that is, from an infinite void. Here, in this void, begins our Universe. Then, and only then, comes the first particle, the first sign of substance; then, much later, from the physical mass that was progressively created between the first particle and the Big Bang, which lasted billions and billions of years, here comes the moment of the real Big Bang. From this event we arrive at the speed of the mind to the Solar System, to the Earth, to the Species, to Us.

The Universe we live in today is no longer expanding. It seems like it is expanding, but in reality it’s not. Stars are fading away and galaxies are disappearing into the great vacuum at the edge of the Universe. Phenomena are constantly being reduced and over time they’ll become less and less and in the end non-existent and, therefore, we are once again approaching the time of nothingness of nothingness.

Another Big Bang? Maybe. In a cosmic vision, “maybes” are part of nature. However, and this is only possible if the now old and unstable cosmic matter piles up in a single point, then there will be, sooner or later, another Big Bang, but on the model of the first one and this would mean that the Big Bangs would follow one after another forever.

We, however, are born from nothing and when we’ll die we’ll return to nothing. Everything that exists in the entire Universe comes from nothing and returns to nothing. Does nothing make sense? It depends on how we want to see it. If we see it in human terms no, if we see it in natural terms yes.

Personally I don’t have a meaning, a meaning in this World-Universe, I only have the meaning that I can give day after day to my life. Philosophers of all times have only chatted about this concept, chatted and nothing more. And then, what other meaning could I have if I was born from nothing? None. Only we, as long as we live, can give meaning to the Universe and to Ourselves, the rest is rhetoric.

Of course, if there are other species in the Universe – extraterrestrials, aliens, creatures different from us, etc. –, and I am sure that there are, they too can give meaning to themselves and to their Planet-Universe. Without the homo-species or aliens, the Universe is just a mass of meaningless and nameless phenomena.

This is, roughly and briefly said, the Universe we live in. There isn’t another. What does it mean? It means that we live on a rock called planet Earth and this planet Earth, in turn, is at the mercy of the Solar System and to all the other phenomena that move blindly in the Cosmos.

Last but not least. Between the nothingness of nothingness and the Universe in which we find ourselves, there is no difference, and since in the end everything returns to the nothingness of nothingness, then we are nothing more than dust, cosmic dust and nothing more. Voilà our destiny and our end.

*Two things. The first, this article is dedicated to all those who want to have a quick idea of ​​our World-Universe as it is and not as we would like it to be.

** The second. I know I’m about to ask a little too much from you by asking to read this slightly “long” article, but I’m not forcing it on you. Of course, my wish is that you read it all. Is simple. In these few easy and interesting pages you’ll find the indispensable knowledge of both our World and our Universe, and it is desirable for each of us to make it our own knowledge before dying. In other words, read this article and virtual immortality will be yours!

“In scientific progress, imagination is more important than knowledge, true or presumed,”Richard Feynman.

If we talk about science like in Copernicus, in Newton and in Darwin style, there’s nothing to say. It’s all in order: it’s all science, real science. The Sun is at the center of the Solar System; we can experience gravity by jumping from a wall; and no one can deny that we are none other than the 194th ape in Darwinian evolution. 

For what concerns mathematics, quantum, strings, it is obvious that here we are not talking about real science like the one of Copernicus, Newton and Darwin, but we are talking about a way of organizing abstract concepts that resemble to science, but in reality they are not science if by science we intend real natural phenomena.

In genetic mutation we are, as we just said, the 194th naked ape according to Desmond Morris. Do mathematics, quantum physics and strings also have genetic mutations and natural selection? What is natural and what is artificial? For me mathematics, quantum, strings, it’s all artificial stuff; Copernicus’ heliocentrism, Newton’s gravity and Darwin’s evolution it’s all natural.

Literature, theatre and philosophy have explained that the world in which we live is an objectification of the absurd, and so it is.

Socially speaking, and this concept is clear even to lizards, ours is a world of legalized gangsters. Call them what you want: kings, popes, politicians, capitalists, nothing changes: gangsters. The first man who appeared on Earth was a gangster.

What we have just said till now  , in a brief and easy way, should be enough to make us understand the world we live in.

Now let’s talk about the Universe that tells us how things are. In other words, do we have to adapt ourselves to a Universe for what it isn’t or for a Universe as it is? I would say for a Universe as it is, and this is precisely what I’m going to talk about in what follows.  

We’ll start from the beginning, from the nothingness of nothingness, that is from zero matter and from an infinite void. Here, in this never ending vacuum, starts the beginning of our Universe and, of course, also of our story. Then comes the first particle, the first spark, the first matter; then, from the physical mass that was gradually created between the first particle and the future Big Bang, which lasted billions and billions of years before being ready to explosion, here comes the real moment of the colossal Big Bang, Big Blast and from this happening up to the Earth, to the species, to us.

The Universe we live in today is no longer expanding. It looks as if it is expanding, but in reality it doesn’t. The stars are fading away and the galaxies are disappearing into the great void at the edge of the Universe. Phenomena and gravity are constantly reduced, they become with time non-existent and we are again, theoretically speaking, approaching the time of nothingness of nothingness.

What about us? We are born from nothingness of nothingness and when we die we’ll return to nothingness. Everything that exists in the entire Universe, comes from nothingness and returns to nothingness. Does nothingness make sense? It depends how do we see it. If we see it in human terms no, if we see it in natural terms yes.

I, personally, I don’t have a sense, a meaning in this World-Universe, I only have the meaning that I alone can give to my life day after day and nothing else. Philosophers of all times have only chatted about this concept. And anyway, what other meaning could I have if I am born from nothingness? None. Nonsense dominates the entire World-Universe. Only we, till we live, can give a sense to the Universe and to ourselves.

Sure, if there are other species in the Universe – extraterrestrials, alien, etc. -, and I’m sure there are, they too can give a meaning to themselves and to their Planet and the Universe. Without homo-species or alien, the Universe is only a mass of phenomena without a meaning and without a name.

This is the Universe in which we live. There is not another. What does it mean? It means that we live on a rock called planet Earth and this, the planet Earth, in turn, is at the mercy of the Solar System and to all the other phenomena that blindly move in the Cosmos.

Between the nothingness of nothingness and the Universe in which we find ourselves, there is no difference, and since in the end everything returns to nothingness of nothingness, therefore we are, in such a phenomenon, nothing more and nothing less than dust in the  

*This article, written in a very simple and synthetic way, is dedicated to all those who want to know the reality of our World and of our Universe as they are.

And who is this? What do you mean who is he? He’s Albert, Albert Einstein. A true phenomenon of physics, they say. Think. Indeed, let’s put it in this way: what if his famous equation, namely, e = mc2, was wrong, and in our opinion it is (first comes the “mass” and then the “energy”); if Einstein’s time was wrong, and it is (it doesn’t exist: has anyone seen time?); if Einstein’s space was wrong, and it is (it doesn’t exist: has anyone seen or touched space?); if mass comes before energy and, in fact, it is like this: mass comes before energy, then his famous equation is wrong; if “God doesn’t play dice,” and God, in fact, doesn’t play dice because he doesn’t exist (therefore an incorrect saying). And not only. If general relativity, supported by spacetime, was wrong, and it is (spacetime doesn’t exist, therefore wrong); if, if; if all this and much more were incorrect, how many beautiful little heads of professors and students would be deceived and falsely instructed day after day by the illustrious genius and scientist?

Are we crazy? Do we mock ourselves? Do they take us all for idiots? There is no deep space. Space is infinite and in this mini niche that we occupy in the universe and in infinite space, it only makes chickens laugh to think of finding anything else around the Great Whole.

Physically speaking, everything that exists in space is identical, the same, nothing changes from one phenomenon to another, all composed of the same matter, from the first particle.

Everything that exists in the solar system: particles, atoms, molecules, proteins, cells, living beings, material phenomena, from “a” to “z” are identical, change only form, shape, and this is so everywhere in the entire universe.

What is Euclid doing in space, then? All our planet, the Earth, needs is a space umbrella that protects it from other celestial bodies that come from deep space and how we could move them away from crushing against the Earth and avoid disaster. That’s all, the rest is waste of time and money paid by the taxpayers. Euclid a mockery for anyone who has a bit of brain!

(more…)

“A little learning

is a dangerous thing

…”

 Alexander Pope

I’m not here, and perhaps I wouldn’t have been able, to explain the word “symbol” linguistically. It is a word of a certain age and comes from the ancient Greek and means “identity card”, (Wikipedia). I use it, in this article, as an idea, interpretation, concept, knowledge, culture and, above all, I use it as our second nature: the first is natural, the second cultural. We’ll deal with it in this article.

I repeat the title: “Everything is a symbol, therefore everything is culture”, therefore human. Outside of the human, everything is nature, a phenomenon whose origins and substance are and remain a question mark, and a question mark is even the one who is writing here. Instead, if nature is seen in human terms, then everything becomes personal interpretation, subjectivity, sense and nonsense. Instinct, honesty, falsehood, arrogance, beauty, science, killing, on the other hand, are culture, therefore symbol, therefore human.

As far as we know, no other species on Earth except homo-species has ever expressed his thoughts in written or spoken words. Only the homo-species did it. The world and the universe are his story, his biography.

(more…)

Learn to live in such a way

That allows you to make

Of a second an eternity

And live eternity as if it

Were made of one second.

A cosmic sensibility and knowledge

gives a healthy and full idea

how the universe is and functions

and how we ought to live

And to die in it.

With this post, I would like to make a present of “the whole universe” to my friends on Facebook, on Twitter, on the Web and in the whole world. And, since today I feel particularly generous and well disposed, I would like also to demonstrate that exists an immortality, a “virtual immortality”, and anyone who desires it, could easily conquer it. This is my second gift of the day.

Of course, “virtual immortality” has nothing to do with “digital immortality”. Digital immortality stinks of brain factories, of mechanical device, and our universe everything is, except a mechanical device.

These two words, “digital” and “virtual”, have nothing to do with one another. The first means artificial intelligence, mechanical gadgets, programmed machines, thinking robots, computers; the second, the virtual, means implicit characteristics, spontaneous, natural, logical, instinctive, potential inner powers. The first, therefore, the “digital”, means object created by man, by homo species; the second, “virtual”, means full of inborn potentialities intrinsically owned by matter, by nature, by the cosmos.

(more…)

Science, do you mean real science?

The one that says the end was

Already in the beginning

That’s what I mean.

This is yet to be discovered.

“Einstein published, in 1905, his famous articles in the scientific journal ‘Annalen der Physik’, where only a few scientists and with difficulties could understand something”; I publish my articles on the Web, on Facebook, on Twitter and anyone, given their scientific simplicity and reality, can read and understand them in the whole world.

The soul doesn’t exist, neither does the spirit, they are concepts like Zeus and Brahma; the memory, instead, exists, I identify it with the mind.

The soul, has anyone seen it? The spirit, has anyone seen it? The memory? This is a physical part of a physical experience. So, even if you can’t see it, it doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.

I remember when my sister got married; I remember the never-ending stair as I went up the Eiffel Tower; I remember when I climbed le Petit Ferret, near Mont Blanc, in Val d’Aosta. The memory is physical, therefore mental. The memory has deep roots. This kind of roots can sleep forever or be awakened at any moment and in any place by conscious matter. But, my sister’s wedding, the stairway of the Eiffel Tower, the ascent of le Petit Ferret, if compared to the deep memory of the mind, they are very recent.

(more…)

“The father of science, Democritus, when the Greeks asked him to show them what an atom was, he took a piece of cheese, put it on a table, took a knife and then in front of them started cutting the cheese into two pieces. He went on cutting each piece into two pieces until he couldn’t cut the last piece anymore. Then Democritus stopped cutting, looked at the people who were watching him carefully and said: ‘Here is your atom, the piece that I no longer can divide into two pieces’. This is not theory, this is science. Science can exist without theory, but not theory without science”.

Bart Kosko*, in his book “The Fuzzy-Thought”, defines logical truths and factual truths as follows: “The difference between logical truth and factual truth founds two vast theories, the theory of coherence and the theory of correspondence. Logical truth is part of the theory of coherence or truth as coherence. The statement 1 + 1 = 2 is true because we have consistently applied the rules of mathematics. The fairy tale ‘the little mermaid’is true in the sense that it is coherent, that is internally consistent, but doesn’t correspond to any real fact.” In fact, in nature, ‘the little mermaid’doesn’t exist.

(more…)

The so-called science – quantum physics, entanglement, mathematics, spacetime – for what concerns the base and the meaning of the universe, cannot help us. It is only a mental artifice, an Everest of artificial symbols and thoughts… Our interest, in this field, is associated with “the most reliable facts”. The lack of these is the lack of a true dialogue both with the universe and among ourselves.

The science that Immanuel Kant called, not synthetic knowledge, but analytical knowledge, is also my science. In fact, it is precisely what I apply in the construction of the cosmic evolution. In other words, synthetic science has to do with facts, experience, empirical studies, etc.; analytical science has to do with logical, reasoning, concepts, etc. It is important to emphasize that synthetic knowledge can change over time, but this doesn’t happen with analytical knowledge: man is mortal, synthetic knowledge; nothingness of the nothingness is immortal, analytical knowledge.

In this sense, my science is a science that goes beyond ordinary science. Ordinary scientists are “the laborers of science”, without wanting to offend them. They, with some exceptions, don’t go beyond the microscope and telescope. Moreover, they belong to the System and, therefore, aren’t free thinkers. Kantian analytical science, begins right here, beyond the microscope and telescope, particularly when we are talking about nothingness of  nothingness and the history of the universe.

(more…)

The universe is supported by four fundamental pillars. Here they are:

1         nothingness of nothingness

2         the proto-element

3         space

4         time

Let’s look at them one by one.

The first: nothingness of nothingness

Why we define it as “nothingness of nothingness”? Because in “nothing”, as it is seen by science, there are particles, atoms, molecules and therefore it is not correct to define it as nothing, but it is not so in nothingness of nothingness. In nothingness of nothingness there is nothing, nonexistence, zero, nullity, just an endless void and nothing else. Nothingness of nothingness is unique, is singular and nobody and nothing inhabits it. This is the first pillar of our cosmic edifice.

(more…)

Einstein, a pillar of modern physics made of Papier-mâché *

1

Sometimes I would have liked to be lazy and spend the rest of my days peacefully and in anonymity. Instead it’s impossible. In this last time I also have nightmares. I see myself sucked into a cosmic crater, in one of those craters that Einstein theorized about in his special or perhaps in his general relativity. Of course, he doesn’t call them cosmic craters, but objects trapped in the curvature of space-time. I can understand a bit about curvatures, but I don’t understand anything about space-time.

If you don’t understand anything about space-time, where’s the problem?

It’s not exactly so. I don’t understand anything in the way Einstein intends them, not in the way I understand space and time.

Well, demonstrate that Einstein’s theory is wrong.

It’s not easy.

There’s no other way.

I wonder, since, honestly, nowadays everybody knows that neither time nor space exists, now, if so, how could he create the theory of special or general relativity based in the existence of space-time? A real block. I can’t follow him.

(more…)

Most scientists

They always start their studies

From the existing universe

But they never wondered

What happened there

Before the existing universe

Since the universe

Surely

Didn’t start with the big bang.

“Einstein published, in 1905, his famous articles in the scientific journal ‘Annalen der Physik’ , where only a few scientists and with difficulties could understand something; I publish my articles on the Web, on Facebook, on Twitter and anyone, given their scientific simplicity and reality, can read and understand them in the whole world”.

A short announcement 

I diluted 4 pages written on “The universe in the pocket” in 10 posts. I hope, if my forces allow me, to publish them on Facebook, every other day a post in Italian and a post in English.

In these 10 posts I would like to sketch the history of the universe from its origins to its end. The knowledge of our origins, since man became aware of his life, has never stopped searching for them. Throughout history the best heads have spoken and written of cooked and raw in this subject, they have made bloodbaths fighting for this and for that origin and, even today, this idea sows deaths and mental confusions in every corner of the Earth.

I don’t know how to say it without being taken for a fool or an arrogant, but I do know that we, the homo species, cannot live in a world we don’t know, not in serenity, however. I know this. My endeavor in this work is this: since the old science couldn’t give an answer to this important question and not even the new one, but, someone, sooner or later, must do it. I did it myself.

My intention on what I am about to write is to make my concept of the universe easier to understand. I would start by describing it in an evolutionary way. Not in a biological way like the Darwinian one, but in a physical way starting from Nothingness of Nothingness, then with the first particle, then with all the other metamorphoses that took place along evolution up to the Big Bang, then, after the Big Bang, with the first star, the first galaxy, the first supernova, the Solar System, the Earth, the seas, life, species and, finally, the human creature. After all, we are what we think and what we think is not ours, it belongs to the universe that created the elements for us to be.

We are, in short, a miniature of the universe, a physical, conscious, human universe. All the elements that make up our body are found in the universe. And what does this mean? It means that we can understand it as we understand our mother: we come into the world from its womb. In short, the universe is just a little bigger than us physically, that’s all!

Here is the demonstration. Thinking with our mind, we can, in a matter of seconds, travel to the Big Bang, to the First Particle, to Nothingness of Nothingness. Why? Because our roots are there and we remain in contact with everything that has proceeded us in an abstract, physical and biological way.

In short, the lord universe is just a little bigger than us physically, that’s all!

Jacques Monod’s theory of “Chance and Necessity”, which fits perfectly with Darwinian evolutionary theory, could also be applied to the theory of the universe starting from the Nothingness of Nothingness and reaching us. Here, however, in this theory, it is not the biological species that arrive on the terrestrial screen by chance and affirm themselves by necessity, here we are dealing with physical phenomena that are realized in the universe by chance and affirm themselves by necessity starting from their relative mass.

My theory on the evolution of the universe cannot be falsified. Here I recall the concept of Karl Popper. To falsify it, it would be necessary to demonstrate that another concept such as, the All of the All is opposed to Nothingness of Nothingness, only this could falsify it, but until we find that at the beginning there was the All of the All we cannot falsify it and, therefore, it will remain a full-fledged science, just as until a white raven is found, the concept of the black raven will remain so. Of course, one could always say: “Before there was the previous universe, therefore, the All of the All”. Well, then another might say: “Before the black crow there was the white crow”, and so on. It would never end.

In Darwin’s theory, chance and necessity guide the winning species; in the Big Bang theory, the physical phenomena scattered throughout the universe born from the Big Bang. In my theory of the beginning of the universe, starting from Nothingness of Nothingness and arriving at the Big Bang, it is all an abstract, logical reasoning and can only be denied with another abstract, logical and more truthful reasoning than mine. Before the Big Bang, however, there is no place for science as we know it today. It is a hermetically sealed world. To enter it, first you need to have a good knowledge of the universe born from the Big Bang and then, and only then, with induction, deduction, reason, abstract but actually concrete science have free entry into the world born from the first particle and reaching the Big Bang event. Those who lack these prerogatives, will remain outside.

And then, we can also put it like this, who could ever go beyond the Big Bang and then to the Nothingness of Nothingness? The chances of falsifying the concept of Nothingness of Nothingness, both logically and scientifically, are almost non-existent. They can be falsified from the first to the last mythological concept, but the Nothingness of Nothingness can’t be falsified. This, the Nothingness of Nothingness, can be considered in good hands and also considered the indispensable basis of the universe.

The article you are reading is divided in 10 posts. With this article I give to the whole of humanity, and I don’t want to sound arrogant, the beginning and the end of the universe, not fantastically, not mythologically, not for how the science manuals describe it and not even for how the eaters of numbers and equations want it ( it is not my intention to offend these gentlemen, but I leave them the interpretation they want to give to my words ), but with a real start and a real end. The life of mankind and of every other species on Earth and in the Great Whole, is played out on this landscape, others are but don’t exist.

Copyright or all the rights belong to the respective owner

There are three more posts to come

Extreme sports (1)

Have you ever wondered what extreme sports are for? Have you ever wondered why no other animal on Earth, not only doesn’t do any extreme sports, but doesn’t do any sport at all? Why has no other monkey ever tried to climb the Everest for the fun of it? Why have I never seen a herd of hippos line up and then race for who from them gets to the nearest lake first and just for the pleasure of the victory? Why does no eagle fly into a dark cave and then communicate to his fellow creatures “I did this”? Why has no wildebeest ever tried to cross a river on a tightrope for the fun of it? Why dive in a shark-infested sea? Why, in short, why jump from the sky from an airplane without a parachute?

According to Aristotle, man is a rational animal. Pascal did not see it this way when he wrote: “All the unhappiness of men has only one source, that is, not knowing how to remain quiet in a room”. Here, thanks to Pascal, are some reasons why we do extreme sport, a sport we know in advance that it can cost us our life, yet we do it!

(more…)

In this chat, has man a sense in the world in which he lives?, I will talk about cosmic reality, cosmic reality as it is and not how we want it to be. Forgive me if I insist in these two ways of seeing the world: one objective and one subjective. I divide the world into real and not real. Particles, atoms, molecules, all physical things are real; ideas, theories, concepts, are unreal in the sense that they are not physical, they exist thanks to the physical world. This last one is totally independent from the human world. Sure, we can have a brief, a very brief influence on it, a local influence, of course, this yes, but, in the long run, the world will be always the old world. Life and harmony are a temporary phenomenon in our universe; chaos and disasters, instead, are its real stabilized nature: entropy and the second law of thermodynamics require it.

Next post: first image of the universe (already published)

I read the Bible, almost from top to bottom, in French, English and Italian. When I read it in English, I was in Australia, in Melbourne, and I remember very well that I found the reading full of things that I didn’t find them mentally digestible, reasonable, human. Anyone who has read this book, perhaps understands me. In short, its reading is absurd when compared with real life.

In other words: Can we believe that a few millennia ago God created the world from nothing and in 7 days? Can we believe that the kangaroos were in Noah’s Ark and then swam to Australia? Can we believe, after seeing it from the sky, that the Earth is flat? I must continue? Thank you.

One time, instinctively and with all my strength, I threw the Bible I was reading against the window of my flat and broke the glass. Why read it, you may say, if you found it illegible? Because I wanted to understand, before having my own opinions on a book written by God himself!, and so at times I forced myself to read other books, not that I liked them, but because I wanted to know their content personally and to know it, I had first to read them.

(more…)

“Germany should be bombed regularly

every 50 years even for no reason “.

Cit. Sir Winston Churchill

It’s time to make some comparisons between these two historical figures: Adolf Hitler and Winston Churchill. I will be very brief and I hope not to say stupid things, I who am not a historian.

Art and politics, Adolf Hitler and Winston Churchill, had them in their blood and more precisely, the first, Adolf Hitler, had them in his heart; the second, Winston Churchill, had them in his brain. Of the first it is said that he was a monster, with a heart I would add; of the second it is said that he was a great man, with the brain I would add. Let’s start with the latter.

Sir Winston Churchill, thanks to his brain, he would have sent 400,000 soldiers, mostly British, to the slaughterhouse on the beach of Dunkirk if it would have been up to him, and perhaps the Second World War could have ended there; the Führer Adolf Hitler, thanks to his heart, didn’t bomb those 400,000 thousand soldiers stranded in Dunkirk either from the air or from the ground; Sir Winston Churchill, thanks to his brain, in the Operation Catapult 1940, shot French ships, his allies, for fear that the Germans could seize them and then use the ships against the British; the Führer Adolf Hitler, thanks to his heart, spared Paris and its monuments despite the negative behavior of the French against the Germans, particularly in the Versailles negotiations at the end of the First World War; Sir Winston Churchill, thanks to his brain, in 1940 many Londoners wanted peace, he wanted war and he got it; the Führer Adolf Hitler, thanks to his heart, delayed his attack on Russia for three months (and it was fatal for him and Germany, some experts said, due to the change of season) to go to help the poor Italian soldiers who ended up under the fire of the Greeks; Sir Winston Churchill, while the war raged in the desert of El Alamein, he painted quietly and happily in a palace in Marrakech; the Führer Adolf Hitler, thanks to his heart, had begun to understand at a certain moment of the war that his generals no longer obeyed him; Sir Winston Churchill, thanks to his brain, at the end of the Second World War, when Germany was now just a pile of debris, had Dresden and other German cities that still breathed razed to the ground; the Führer Adolf Hitler, thanks to his heart, in the last days of his life married his partner, Eva Braun, and then committed suicide together with his wife in order not to end, both he and she, neither alive nor dead in the hands of the enemy.

(more…)

Mr. Priestly Williams writes on Facebook after reading my “The cosmic foundations and the discovery that God is = to Nothingness of Nothingness” and some other titles of my books that I have published:“The Trilogy”, namely “Flash about man and the universe”, “From nothingness of nothingness to virtual immortality”, and “Son of the elements and the big bang, the cosmic autobiography of a human being”, plus “The 4 pillars that support the universe and the before and the afterlife of the Big Bang”, published by Contro Corrente (Print MnM Edizions), plus the article I published on my blog: “Einstein, a pillar of modern physics made of papier mache or my Singapore speech”.

Here are his words:

“Are you over burdened by assignments? We can help you out. We have highly qualified and experienced expert in each field. Our fee is pocket friendly. We offer discounts to our clients with many orders. Kindly message us in case you need help. Thank you.

My reply:

Thank you so much Sir. I am very pleased and honored by your invitation to talk about my work in the prestigious University of Oxford. No Italian university has ever invited me or just considered my work. *

Still many thanks and greetings.

Francis Sgambelluri

*   P. S.    I don’t exclude the fact that to present my work, the University of Oxford would ask me for a fee. Anyhow, I’m sure that Mr. Priestly Williams will give me more details about it.

Today, and we must admit it, even if the managers and masters of these means of communication worldwide, may turn out to be on the wrong social side, but in fact, are they? Indeed, thanks to these media – Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram, Web, Wikipedia, etc. – thanks to them, the people of the whole world, the one for whom education is not always at hand, are becoming aware of how physically and politically this rock that turns and turns around the Sun is really made and ruled. Conscious or unconscious, it is a real Revolution without bloodshed. And not only. It is also instructive, educational, cultural and a human revolution, never done it before. Such a Revolution (with a capital R) on a planetary level could bring about social changes that we don’t realize it yet.

I have taught in different countries and in my classrooms there were sometimes 20 students and sometimes more and others less, but today when I publish an article on Facebook, Twitter, etc., it could be seen and read by thousands of people. A big difference, isn’t it? Thanks to all those who deserve them!

A cosmic awareness

gives us a healthy and full idea

how the universe is concretely made

and not as we want it to be”!

With this post, friends of Facebook, of Twitter and of the Web, I will give you the whole universe and forever. Do you think, maybe, that I’m crazy telling you this? At all! Read this article first and then decide if I am crazy or you, perhaps, a bit surprised by this argument!

Let’s begin:

This post could make some chattering, not noises created by numbers, equations, particles, quants, none of this stuff, but real chattering or, if you want, noises of species, of planets, of the solar system, of galaxies and, finally, cosmic noises, noises never heard before and much less will be heard in the future, they are, putting all of them together, a unique murmuring universal sound in the background.

Our universe, finally!, has become transparent, all crystal clear, there are no more mysteries about it, a single and universal mirror. In fact, once we know that our universe has a metaphysical background, that it has a beginning and an end, and from its first particle to the last of which it is composed, scientifically speaking, is pure irrationality. In short, once we have taken consciously a realistic picture of our universe, then we can say that we understand who we are and the world and the universe in which we live.

(more…)